Show the Real Me: Italian Neorealism 

The narratives of Neorealist films were typically focused on the lives of the poor and working-class, highlighting social issues such as poverty, unemployment, and injustice. These films did not shy away from depicting the struggles and hardships faced by ordinary people, and they often eschewed conventional happy endings in favor of more ambiguous or downbeat conclusions. The intention was to reflect the real conditions of life in post-war Italy, rather than providing escapism or entertainment.

Time Period: 1943-50s

Italian Neorealism was a groundbreaking film movement that arose in Italy in the aftermath of World War II, profoundly influencing global cinema. Emerging in the mid-1940s and peaking in the early 1950s, this movement was characterized by its stark depiction of everyday life and its focus on the struggles of ordinary people. Italian Neorealism is celebrated for its raw honesty, its humanism, and its significant departure from the escapist fantasies of pre-war Italian cinema.

The origins of Italian Neorealism are deeply rooted in the socio-political landscape of post-war Italy. The country was left in ruins after the war, with its economy shattered and its society in turmoil. The Fascist regime, which had controlled Italy since the 1920s, collapsed, leaving a power vacuum and a sense of disillusionment among the populace. Traditional Italian cinema, which had been heavily influenced by Fascist propaganda, was no longer relevant to the realities faced by everyday Italians. In response, a new generation of filmmakers sought to create films that reflected the harsh truths of their time.

Italian Neorealist films were marked by several distinctive features. One of the most notable was the use of real locations rather than studio sets. This practice gave the films an authenticity that was previously unseen in Italian cinema. Filmmakers often chose to shoot in the streets, in the countryside, and in the homes of ordinary people, capturing the environment in which their stories took place. This approach was both a practical necessity, given the limited resources available after the war, and a conscious artistic choice to ground the films in reality.

Another hallmark of Neorealism was the use of non-professional actors. Directors believed that casting ordinary people, who lived the lives they were portraying, would bring a greater sense of realism and emotional truth to their films. This practice also allowed filmmakers to bypass the glamorous stars of pre-war Italian cinema, who were often associated with the Fascist era and its discredited ideals.

The narratives of Neorealist films were typically focused on the lives of the poor and working-class, highlighting social issues such as poverty, unemployment, and injustice. These films did not shy away from depicting the struggles and hardships faced by ordinary people, and they often eschewed conventional happy endings in favor of more ambiguous or downbeat conclusions. The intention was to reflect the real conditions of life in post-war Italy, rather than providing escapism or entertainment.

One of the earliest and most influential films of the Neorealist movement was Rome, Open City (1945), directed by Roberto Rossellini. This film, which was made shortly after the liberation of Rome, depicted the lives of ordinary Romans during the Nazi occupation. It was notable for its use of real locations and non-professional actors, as well as its stark portrayal of the brutality of the war and the resilience of the Italian people. Rome, Open City was a critical and commercial success, and it helped to establish Neorealism as a significant new force in cinema.

Another seminal work was Bicycle Thieves (1948), directed by Vittorio De Sica. This film tells the story of a poor man named Antonio, who relies on his bicycle to find work and support his family. When his bicycle is stolen, Antonio and his young son set out to recover it, encountering a series of challenges and setbacks along the way. Bicycle Thieves is widely regarded as one of the greatest films ever made, and it exemplifies many of the key elements of Neorealism: a focus on ordinary people, a simple yet powerful narrative, and an unflinching portrayal of social issues.

Luchino Visconti’s La Terra Trema (1948) is another important Neorealist film. This epic drama follows a family of Sicilian fishermen who struggle against economic exploitation and natural disasters. Visconti used non-professional actors from the local community and shot the film on location in a small fishing village. La Terra Trema is notable for its epic scope and its deep empathy for its characters, as well as its critique of the social and economic conditions that oppress them.

Umberto D. (1952), directed by Vittorio De Sica, is another key work of Neorealism. This film tells the story of an elderly man, Umberto, who is struggling to make ends meet in post-war Rome. Faced with eviction from his apartment and unable to find work, Umberto’s only companion is his dog, Flike. Umberto D. is a poignant and deeply humanistic film, and it is often cited as one of the finest examples of Neorealism.

The impact of Italian Neorealism on Italian filmmaking was profound. The movement brought a new level of realism and social awareness to Italian cinema, and it inspired a generation of filmmakers to explore the lives of ordinary people and the issues they faced. The techniques and themes of Neorealism also had a lasting influence on global cinema, inspiring movements such as the French New Wave and British social realism.

The end of Italian Neorealism, which had its peak from the mid-1940s to the early 1950s, was marked by a combination of cultural, economic, and political changes in Italy. By the mid-1950s, the movement began to lose momentum.

Firstly, the socio-economic conditions in Italy improved significantly during the post-war economic boom known as the “Italian economic miracle.” As the country’s economy recovered and prospered, the intense poverty and hardship that Neorealist films often depicted became less prevalent. The audience’s appetite for stories centered on deprivation and social struggle diminished as prosperity increased, and people became more interested in entertainment and escapism.

Secondly, there was a shift in government policies and film industry practices. The Italian government, seeking to promote a more positive image of the country, began to support films that depicted Italy in a more favorable light. This led to increased funding and support for films that were more commercial and less focused on the gritty realism of Neorealism. Additionally, the commercial success of Hollywood films influenced Italian filmmakers and producers, who began to favor more glamorous and profitable projects.

Censorship also played a role in the decline of Neorealism. The Italian government, as well as the Catholic Church, exerted pressure on filmmakers to avoid controversial or overly critical depictions of Italian society. This made it increasingly difficult for Neorealist filmmakers to produce their stark, socially conscious films.

The evolution of the filmmakers themselves also contributed to the end of the movement. Many of the key directors of Neorealism, such as Roberto Rossellini, Vittorio De Sica, and Luchino Visconti, began to explore different styles and themes in their subsequent works. For instance, Rossellini moved towards more personal and introspective films, De Sica ventured into more varied genres, and Visconti transitioned into more opulent and stylized productions.

Moreover, the advent of new cinematic movements both within and outside of Italy led to the decline of Neorealism. The French New Wave, for example, brought fresh ideas and techniques that influenced filmmakers worldwide. Within Italy, the commedia all’italiana, or “comedy Italian style,” became popular, focusing on social satire and light-hearted narratives.

Elements of Neorealism can still be seen in contemporary filmmaking. The use of real locations, non-professional actors, and a focus on social issues continue to be employed by filmmakers around the world. Directors such as Ken Loach, the Dardenne brothers, and Jia Zhangke have all been influenced by Neorealism, and their work reflects its enduring legacy.

In today’s cinematic landscape, dominated by big-budget blockbusters and commercial films, there is a strong argument to be made for a new wave of Neorealism. Many contemporary films focus on spectacle and entertainment, often at the expense of realism and social relevance. A return to the principles of Neorealism could provide a much-needed counterbalance, offering audiences films that reflect the real world and address the issues that affect their lives.

Written by: Manasvi Deore

Leave a Reply